|
Well
there's two things that are straight away apparent about the book: 1)
Its bloody big and 2)Its bloody expensive. Its so big and expensive it
needs two writers to write it. Its so big and expensive it had the
biggest launch for a punk book what with web sites and
exhibitions. Don't get me wrong its some feat to collate so much information
and no wonder there was a whole team working on the project.
Straight away though that's its
problem. A book this size says "I am the definitive guide to punk. To be better than me you will have to be bigger and more expensive and
that is impossible. I have more photos and more interviews and I know
all the right people."
It states in the first pages its aim to
'convey, the feel, the smell, attitude and humour of punk' and
then through the next x amount of pages it proceeds to just kill
the subject dead by overkill of photos and quoted text. As such instead
of a consistent narrative you end up with a jerky ponder some beast. And
that's where it fails. The photos are fantastic but there are just so
many. If a picture paints a thousand words then this book is the
equivalent of War & Peace. Punk was sharp and
concise...this book is not. You begin to weary soon after starting
reading. Who is this book for ??? I can imagine this book sitting in
some trendy forty something's loft. Guests come around and idly
flick remarking at how quaint and outrageous it all was before moving
on. More and more it looks like an amalgamation of the last 4 big
history of punk books.
Again its written solely form the inner
circle of punk ...the so called starters ...none of the smaller
bands are represented and the beginnings of punk are just casually
nailed down to the VU, MC5 & Iggy. The people interviewed are starting to
resemble politicians now in that whether what they say is the
truth doesn't matter because they have repeated it so many times over
the years its become the truth. This book comes out with all the
old clichés.... 'The Stranglers weren't Punk'.....99% of us knew The
Stranglers WERE punk and we loved them. Arrogant statements like
'The class of 76 went on to become the main movers and shakers in
subsequent decades' just make me laugh ...movers in shakers in
what ?? Music ?? world peace ???
This book fails because it seeks to glorify
just the few and ignores the fact that the so called originators were
passed by and even laughed at by the next wave-the Class of 77. Worse is
the efforts by the authors to write themselves into the history of punk
like a punky Forest Gump. As punk nonentities of the time their words
are now dispersed between words of the major players as if they
were somehow seminal and part of the original gang. Jesus one of the
writers was in Blue Rondo a La Turk and the other in Saatchi and Saatchi
!!! Its like finding out they were in Bucks Fizz or Stepps. Have
they no taste or shame ?
All writers about Punk should be made to read two
books. First Stuart Home's Cranked Up Really
High for its brevity and its understanding
of the evolution of genres like Punk and second Please
Kill Me which should be held up as the prime
example of the genre. Exciting, informative, inspirational, sad, funny,
shocking and heartbreaking and a fucking good read...hell it could have
been a novel or a film.
This book fails because it turns a microscope
on a tiny but important bit of punk and chokes the excitement of it with
an avalanche of images and prose. It succeeds as a giant compendium
of punk but little else.
One day the definitive guide to Punk will be
written but big ain't necessarily better. The Punk Book sure ain't
the last word.
|