Crass - Feedback

 Home >> Punk Bands >> Crass >> Feedback 

This part of the site has got to be one of my favourites. I thought it might provoke a reaction but the differences in scale suprised me. From torrents of verbal abuse to well reasoned arguments for and against to pats on the back. They are all welcome here and I never censor anything. Abusive emails just make me laugh;  Keep 'em coming.

Hi, whoever you might be.  Just thought i'd drop you a line to congratulate you on a great site.  I also want to take up the question you ask about Crass...what did they achieve?  Well, the same could probably be asked of, say, the Pistols?  The answer, put simplistically, would probably be that the Pistols affected the way some of us looked at and perceived things.  And they happened to do it through what i consider to be a great musical form.  I believe the same could be said of Crass.  Or, at least, they made this 15 year old kid at the time look at and question certain aspects of the life and society that surrounded me.  I would readily agree with your argument that some of the lyrics are lacking in their content in that they tend to attack only the white status quo (which is arguably justified, but that's another story) but i believe that's where Crass's strength actually was because their message(s) were implicit rather than explicit.  It was the system and cultural practices that upheld institutions such as marriage, meat eating, religion etc that was being attacked.  The message went further than just specific institutions.  Or, as i've said, that's how i understood it.  Which brings me onto another aspect that seems to always be overlooked when talking about bands and their influence etc.  And that's the audience.  Bands do not stand in isolation.  They are, if you like, only as good as the people who appreciate them.  The Pistols, the Clash, Crass and everyone else would mean absolutely nothing were it not for the people who came to see them.  So the question of influence, as far as Crass are concerned, must be approached by asking how many people bought their records?  How many people went to see them?  How many people were actually affected by them?  The answer, i think, would be thousands (probably hundreds of thousands...or am i just being romantic :-)  And that affection has lasted, in some people at least, to this day.  And it could also be argued that, much like the Pistols, Crass's influence was cultural as well as musical - many of the people who initiated what became known as "Rave" culture, where directly influenced by Crass.  If not by their lyrics per se, then by the DIY ethic that they continually espoused.  And continuing on the audience theme, you seem to be quite fascinated by clothes.  Now i know it's a boring old cliche but punk is not, and never has been, about clothes.  So to condemn Crass for introducing the gloomy black and white world of their artwork and clothing again fails to recognise the role of the audience - just because Crass wore black does not explain why that particular look was adopted by so many people.  There must be more to it.  I'd suggest that Crass, just like the Pistols, managed to tap into and reflect something that was already there.  And in doing so, managed to influence, or at least articulate in a relatively accessable way, the thinking and perhaps actions of a lot of people.  

Trev 25/5/00

My reply

Thank you for a very well reasoned letter and some good points. I think when it comes down to it its all about a piece of plastic..... to read any more into it and you are on dodgy ground.. its all about rock'n'roll and Crass quite simply were'nt rock'n';roll. Attacking marriage ??? Thats easy. Attacking religion.... even easier... eating meat.... so easy. Now the question is are you thinking for yourself  or are you standing in a room with hundreds of others like sheep repeating what someone Crass ... tells you. Making your own mind up involves having both sides of the story not a polemic and making a reasoned judgement.  Did the Pistols change anything... probably not ... have an influence ?... undoubtably but they didn't have to forever quantify and preach like Crass. If I was to follow the ten commandments of Crass I would have plastic shoes eat vegetarian food, not be married to a woman who  does not wear make up' shave her armpits etc or wear high heels, believe in anarchy and peace and so on and so on.  Fact.... the poll tax riots brought down the poll tax and eventually Maggie... anarchy and peace my arse.

I'm sorry if I seem obsessed with clothes.. I never noticed it but I think it is pertinent to Crass. For people who frequently bandied around terms such as fascism and communism and attacked people ie Berketex Bride, women and priests etc for their clothes I find it  a tad ironic that their logos, artwork, dress and followers all adopted a sort of military look. An image is an outward expression of your beliefs and as all manipulators of political power kno is a powerful tool and helps maintain a seperate identity.

 As to Crass influencing rave culture.... look at those rave adverts... remind you of Never Mind The Bollocks ???? It don't remind me of Crass. Don't start me on rave culture.... its the governments dream.... thousands of people drugged all night in a field /club like sheep.  The distinction between rock'n'roll and normal life has gone. Rave music plays in the background of B&Q ads ....there is no rebellion. Scuse me but Crass didn't invent DIY music, labels, distribution.. there were others before them. You mention the role of the audience.... well there you go... what was it for Crass. If it was the music why weren't you listening to the lyrics....If it was the lyrics were you arguing , thinking or disagreeing or were you blindly repeating them coz you learned them off the sleeve ??? Were Crass musicians or politicians ?? Were you sheep or were you fans  ???

I make the point frequently on the website punk was part of rock'n'roll plain and simply....it was fun exciting and rebellion but it was just rock'n'roll...read any more into it and you are on the wrong track. I'm not religious but basically I had more respect for missionaries going to Africa and trying to convert natives than Crass. They had the bottle to take a message and try and spread it not like Crass to the converted. You say there must be more to Crass.. that they tapped into something. I think you are right here but only up to a point. Basically punk collapsed in on itself around 1979... as the first and second wave bands all collapsed it left itself without direction and without a figurehead and to be honest Crass filled that void and gave punk a fresh injection and changed punk into the rebirth of the hippies.

I'm no apologist for the pistols but if Crass had been the no 1 band in 76 when they formed you can bet your life the pistols would have appeared on stage in gaudy clothes, eating a steak. reading a porn mag and fighting .....why coz that's rebellion ... that's what happens when someone tells you should be doing something once too often. To them I'm a conformist... a capitalist , sexist, animal torturing .. perpetuating the male myth .... yawn ad infinitum.

If you like Crass and got something from them then I'm happy for you.. to me they were never a punk band.... I mean how do you define punk ???

Thanks once again for the email and if you don't mind I'll post it on the site coz I like it and its well reasoned and you took the trouble to say something. 

Trevs reply 26/5/00

Hi Paul, and cheers for replying to my message.  I'd disagree with some of the points you make (now there's a surprise :-) and i would venture that as we're both of us looking at the situation in hindsight, things tend to become a bit distorted, perhaps most significantly around what are seen as "easy targets" and the longevity of Crass's "preaching".  But anyway, i don't propose to go on with the debate, except to say that no, i am not some blindly led Crass-esque sheep (although i'll readily admit to having been initially but, ironically (and pertinantly) it was Crass's lyrics and over-arching ideals that led me away from being so) and, like you, i believe they were wrong with their Anarchy and Peace stance.  As you rightly say, it is direct action that changes things.  

And finally from the guestbook

My name is ...: HEINZ HAUGEN
Spit it out then !!!!: HELLO THIS IS A REALLY GREAT SITE.GOOD READING AND LOTS OF INFORMATION. I AGREE WITH YOU ON WHAT YOU SAY ABOUT CRASS,THEY REALLY SUCK. MY FAVORITES ARE SEX PISTOLS.UK SUBS.CAOS UK.EXPLOITED,COCNEY REJECTS,SUBHUMANS. UK SUBS PLAYED IN MY TOWN(STAVANGER)EARLIER THIS YEAR AND IT WAS A GREAST GIG.I TALKED TO THE BAND AND THEY SIGNED MY WARHEAD SINGEL. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK ON THIS SITE THANKS

 

My name is ...: Becca Puke
Spit it out then !!!!: Hey, I've just read your epitaph to Crass - I like em but I was well impressed with the absolutely fucking brilliant slagging ya dealt em. Someone needed to say somthing like that at the time to get rid of their mysterious aura. Sites + zines which relish arse licking and brown nosing their idols are all over the shop but to get a writer who sez what they think with no bullshitting is rare nowadays, I hope one of crass gets to somehow read that + get it right between the eyes - wotever doesn't kill ya just makes ya stronger right!!! Nothing is sacred!!!!

 

Thu July 20 2000 - 01:04:49
My name is ...: Steve Resin

Never mind the Pistols and all that shite, it was only ever about money anyway. The only true great punk band from the late seventies was Crass, who shunned the major labels & started their own, spoke more about the state of the country in one song than Lydon could in a lifetime of dross albums, kept the price of their records to an absolute minimum and even run a punk commune in London where anyone was free to call in & crash out. Their art-work was revolutionary and their singer (steve ignorant) the best punk voice the world will ever know. And where is Rotten, king of punk, now? Sitting on his fat arse in sunny L.A., thats where! In the words of The Exploited, "Fuck the USA". "They said that we was trash, but the name is Crass not Clash. You can stuff your punk credentials, cos it's them who take the cash."

From: Steve Diamond Geezer

Sent: 18 August 2000 23:56

Some of your points made about Crass on your excellent site are valid, but I recall Crass coming to prominence (for me anyway) as the `real` punk rock was dying a 1000 deaths with shit `New Wave` bands. Ok Crass were preaching an impossible dream of Anarchy Peace and Freedom (a contridiction in terms\ to most people) but their hearts and minds were surely in the right places and they seemed to genuinely beleive in what they were sayin. I saw Crass\and Dirt in a North London Pub (early 80`s) I think and they were awful\par musically, but it cost a quid to get in and was a good laugh. As pointed out by someone else on your site theyre records also sold for a fraction of other punk bands, they shunned TOTP`s (I never knew that) how could they appear on tv? It would undermine everything they preached. And at least Crass NEVER sold out, like 99% of so called Punk bands (esp The Clash). For me, Crass gave me some fucking good hardcore punk music to singalong with in my bedshit, I reckon a lot of the lyrics were vrillant, they made me think about life and the system and made me question a lot of shit that we lie down for, and I think that was all Crass really hoped to achieve. I reckon they are the bollocks and Steve Ignorant is still getting a sore throat with The Stratford Mercenaries. Keep up the good work mate.Steve. 

5/5/01

Hello,
  About your article on CRASS.  I agree with you that they did attack subjects that people have been already talking about (marriage, meat eaters,etc.)  But nothing was done about it.  They however were trying to get people to stand up and take action.  Sometimes the band can be misunderstood because of their odd lyrics but rest assure, they did have an impact and did accomplish many things in the underground world.  CRASS stood up and said stop talking about it and do it.  They passed out flyers at their shows giving people ideas on what they could do.  They wanted change and gained many people on their side while they were together.  
  CRASS was formed buy Steve Ignorant and Penny Rimbaud for the sole purpose of getting their message out.  You may have heard it all before but they dug deeper into the core of the subject and got people to stop believing and taking shit.  I don't see how you can look at the Pistols and said they made more of a change then CRASS.  The Pistols were racists and had nothing to back up their attempted rebellion.

 Back To Top